균형전략 관련 자료

상위항목: 현실주의 관련 자료

Balancing vs. Bandwagoning

  • John A. Vasquez and Colin Elman, eds., Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2003.
  • John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton, 2001. Chap. 5.
  • Paul W. Schroeder, "Historical Reality vs. Neo-Realist Theory." International Security 19, 1 (Summer 1994): 108-48.31
  • Richard Rosecrance and Chih-Cheng Lo, “Balancing, Stability, and War: The Mysterious Case of the Napoleonic International System.” International Studies Quarterly 40, 4 (December 1996): 479-500.
  • Randall L. Schweller, "Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In." International Security 19, 1 (Summer 1994): 72-107.
  • Symposium on Balancing vs. Bandwagoning, in Security Studies, 1, 3 (Spring 1992).
  • Eric J. Labs, "Do Weak States Bandwagon?" Pp. 383-416.
  • Robert G. Kaufman, "To Balance or to Bandwagon? Alignment Decisions in 1930s Europe." Pp. 417-447.
  • Stephen M. Walt, "Alliance, Threats, and U.S. Grand Strategy: A Reply to Kaufman and Labs." Pp. 448-82.

Whom Do States Balance Against? Land Powers and Sea Powers

  • Jack S. Levy and William R. Thompson, “Balancing on Land and at Sea: Do States Ally Against the Leading Global Power?” International Security, 35, 1 (Summer 2010): 7-43.
  • Jack S. Levy and William R. Thompson, "Hegemonic Threats and Great Power Balancing in Europe, 1495-2000." Security Studies, 14, 1 (January-March 2005), 1-30.
  • David W. Blagden, Jack S. Levy, and William R. Thompson, “Correspondence: Sea Powers, Continental Powers, and Balancing Theory.” International Security, 36, 2 (Fall 2011): 190-202.
  • Paul Van Hooft, “All-In or All-Out: Why Insularity Pushes and Pulls American Grand Strategy to Extremes.” Security Studies 29, 4 (2020): 701–29.

What Do States Balance Against? Disaggregating Power

  • Steven E. Lobell, “A Granular Theory of Balancing.” International Studies Quarterly, 62, 3, (September 2018): 593–605.
  • Steven E. Lobell, "Bringing Balancing Back In: Britain's Targeted Balancing, 1936– 1939." Journal of Strategic Studies 35, 6 (2012): 747-73.
  • Erik Gartzke and Jon R. Lindsay, “The Influence of Sea Power on Politics: Domain- and Platform-Specific Attributes of Material Capabilities.” Security Studies 29, 4 (2020), 601-36.
  • See also defensive realism in week 3.
  • Balancing (or Not) in Non-Western Systems
  • Stuart Kaufman, Richard Little, and William C. Wohlforth, eds, Balance of Power in World History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
  • William C. Wohlforth, Richard Little, Stuart Kaufman, David Kang, Charles Jones, Victoria Tin-Bor Hui, Arthur Eckstein, Daniel Deudney, and William Brenner, “Testing Balance of Power in World History,” European Journal of International Relations 13, 6 (June 2007): 155-185.
  • Victoria Tin-bor Hui, War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • 32
  • Victoria Tin-Bor Hui, “Toward a Dynamic Theory of International Politics: Insights from Comparing Ancient China and Early Modern Europe.” International Organization, 58, 1 (Winter 2004): 175-205.
  • Philip Streich, “The Balance of Power in Japan’s Warring States Period,” Asia Pacific World 3, 2 (Autumn 2012): 17-36.
  • Arthur M Eckstein, Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome.
  • Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.
  • Jørgen Møller, “Why Europe Avoided Hegemony: A Historical Perspective on the Balance of Power.” International Studies Quarterly 58, 4 (December 2014): 660–70.

“Soft Balancing”

  • Robert Anthony Pape, "Soft Balancing Against the United States." International Security 30, 1 (Summer 2005): 7-45.
  • Keir A. Lieber and Gerard Alexander, "Waiting for Balancing: Why the World is not Pushing Back." International Security, 30, 1 (Summer 2005): 109-39.
  • T.V. Paul, "Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy." International Security 30, 1 (Summer 2005): 46-71.
  • T.V. Paul, Restraining Great Powers: Soft Balancing from Empires to the Global Era.
  • New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018.
  • H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable review of Paul book (10-29, June 2019), https://issforum.org/ISSF/PDF/ISSF-Roundtable-10-29.pdf Stephen M. Walt, Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy. New York: W.W. Norton, 2005. Pp. 126-32.
  • Robert J. Art; Stephen G. Brooks and William C. Wohlforth; and Keir A. Lieber and Gerard Alexander, “Correspondence: Striking the Balance.” International Security 30, 3 (Winter 2005/06): 177-96.