위키스 자료번호

위키스 논문별 자료번호 는 현재 위키스가 가지고 있는 pdf 파일을 입수순대로 인덱싱한 것입니다. 위키스 프론트 데스크에서 자료를 번호와 함께 요청하시면, 간단한 자격확인 뒤, pdf를 제공해 드립니다. 파일을 [email protected]로 전송하여 주시거나, 다운로드 받을 수 있는 링크나 판매사이트를 제공하여 주시기 바랍니다. (구글 북스, 아마존, 대학 출판사등 공신력 있고 지속력이 보장된 웹사이트들의 링크를 제공하여 주시기를 바랍니다)

데이터베이스

자료번호는 분야를 막론하고 자료의 입수순으로 인덱싱한 것입니다. 데이터베이스도 좋은 선택입니다.

[[
[email protected]

문헌데이터베이스]][[파일:

Facebook Ketentuan AI kami berbeda tergantung pada wilayah tempat Anda tinggal Di luar Inggris, Brasil, atau Wilayah Eropa:Ketentuan Layanan Meta AI mengatur penggunaan produk dan fitur AI Generatif kami oleh pengguna di luar Inggris, Brasil, dan Wilayah Eropa.

Inggris:Ketentuan Layanan Meta AI Inggris mengatur penggunaan produk dan fitur AI Generatif kami jika Anda tinggal di Inggris.

Wilayah Eropa:Ketentuan Layanan Meta AI Uni Eropa mengatur penggunaan produk dan fitur AI Generatif kami jika Anda tinggal di Wilayah Eropa.

Meta AIs Terms of Service (Brazil)

These Terms of Service (“Terms”) apply when you access and use Meta AIs and other software, tools, services, documentation, content, functionalities, and generative AI features that we make available to you through any Meta product (collectively, “AIs”). These terms are a legally binding agreement between you and Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”, “we”, “our”, or “us”). By using AIs, you agree to be bound by these Terms, the Meta Terms of Service, and any other applicable terms and policies.

Your Commitments Eligibility

Without limiting the Meta Terms of Service or any other applicable terms or policies, you cannot access AIs if you are under the age of 13 (or such greater age required in your country or territory) or if you are prohibited from receiving our services or software under applicable laws.

Acceptable Uses

You may not access, use, or allow others to access or use AIs in any manner that would:

Be unlawful (including but not limited to any manner that promotes, contributes to, or encourages illegal or unlawful activity), including conduct that describes, encourages, supports, or distributes in any form child sexual abuse materials

Generate, promote, disseminate, or otherwise use or facilitate content that may harm other individuals, including to encourage self-harm, discrimination, bullying, humiliation, and/or other emotional harms. This also includes causing harm by using AIs to: (i) deploy subliminal, manipulative, or deceptive techniques to distort behavior by impairing decision making; or (ii) exploit people due to their age, disability, or a specific social or economic situation to distort their behavior

Present a risk of death or bodily harm to individuals (including in relation to illegal drugs, weapons, or self-harm)

Generate, promote, disseminate, or otherwise use or facilitate adult content, such as erotic chat, pornography, and content meant to arouse sexual excitement

Deceive or mislead others, including but not limited to activity related to plagiarism, scams, phishing or malware, and furtherance of misinformation or disinformation

Generate, promote, disseminate, or otherwise use or facilitate content that may violate or infringe upon the rights of others (including but not limited to intellectual property rights and privacy rights)

Solicit professional advice (including but not limited to medical, psychological, financial, or legal advice) or content to be used for the purpose of engaging in other regulated activities (including but not limited to political campaigning or lobbying). No statements, responses, or content generated by AIs should be interpreted as an offer or provision of professional care or as a substitute for consultation with a qualified provider.

Override safety or privacy filters, controls, or mechanisms

Prompts, Results, and Other Content Rights to Content

AIs allows you to provide materials for processing, which could include text, documents, images, or recordings, depending on the integration (together, “Prompts”) and will generate a response (“Outputs”) based on your Prompts, as well as any feedback you provide (“Feedback”) collectively, “Content”. You may not provide prompts or use AIs in any way that infringes or violates someone else’s rights, including intellectual property rights. Except as expressly provided in these Terms, you retain all right, title, and interest – including any intellectual property rights – that you have in and to your Prompts. You agree that your provision of Prompts will not violate these Terms, including the Acceptable Uses, and other policies that apply to your use of AIs.

Meta AIs Data

The Meta Privacy Policy governs our processing of personal information processed through the AIs and explains how we collect, use, and share personal information - including personal information you submit as Prompts, Feedback, or other Content, your activity across our products, and personal information we collect from and about your device. We process personal information, including information on sensitive topics, as described in the Privacy Policy, to improve AIs and related technology.

When information is shared with AIs, the AIs may retain and use that information to provide more personalized Outputs. Do not share information that you don’t want the AIs to use and retain such as account identifiers, passwords, financial information, or other sensitive topics.

If the AIs cannot answer your query, or if our systems determine that a more relevant or up-to-date response could be provided by a partner, we may ask a third party to provide a response. For example, in these cases we share questions contained in a Prompt and limited metadata to enable a more accurate answer with a third-party search engine, and include the search results in the response to your Prompt. The information we share with third parties may contain personal information if your Prompt contains personal information about any person. By using AIs, you are instructing us to share your information with third parties when it provides you with more relevant or useful responses. Those third parties will use any information we share – which could include personal information about you or others if you include such information in your Prompt– in accordance with those third parties’ privacy policies. You can view the list of these third parties, and links to their privacy policies, by visiting our Privacy Center. We add or remove third parties from time to time, and notice will be provided solely by adding or removing that party from the list referenced above.

In some cases, Meta will review your interactions with AIs, including the content of your conversations with or messages to AIs, and this review can be automated or manual (human).

Depending on where you reside, you or an authorized agent may request access to your personal information from Meta in a portable format, deletion of your personal information, or correction of your personal information, subject to certain exceptions. To learn more about how you can access and delete your personal information associated with AIs, and exercise any applicable rights, visit our Privacy Center. It is important that you review the Privacy Center before you try to delete any personal information or delete or deactivate your account. Depending on how you use AIs, deleting individual messages, entire threads, or even your account may not delete our copy of your personal information, and the Privacy Center describes the correct way to delete your personal information.

Accuracy

AIs are a new technology that are still improving in accuracy. As such the accuracy of any content, including outputs cannot be guaranteed and that outputs may be disturbing or upsetting. You should not rely upon outputs for any purpose or use outputs to inform professional advice or decisions related to medicine, finance, law or pharmaceuticals. If you plan to use outputs for any reason, it is your sole responsibility to verify outputs. AIs and any content may not reflect accurate, complete or current information.

Warning Regarding Content

The AIs will generate Content based on Prompts that you provide. The specific Content that the AIs will return based on your Prompts cannot be predicted in advance. AIs might generate content that you consider offensive or objectionable and/or that does not represent Meta’s views. By agreeing to these terms and by using AIs, you recognize and assume the risk that the prompts you provide might result in generation of content that you consider offensive or objectionable. You also recognize and agree that you – not Meta – are responsible for your use of, and/or any actions you take in relation to, content generated by the AIs based on your prompts.

Meta's Rights Meta’s Rights Regarding Content

Meta may use Content and related information including through automated or manual (i.e. human) review and through third-party vendors in some instances, including:

To provide, maintain, and improve Meta services and features. To conduct and support research To monitor your use of AIs for compliance with these Terms and applicable laws and to report violations of applicable laws or regulations as required by law or as otherwise requested by a court order or government authority To remove unsafe, discriminatory, or other Content that violates these Terms, Meta’s Community Standards, or any other applicable policies and terms To suspend or remove accounts that violate these Terms with respect to your use of AIs Suspension and Termination

If we determine that you have breached these Terms or other applicable terms and policies, we may suspend or permanently disable your access to AIs or other Meta services or features, and we may permanently disable or delete your account including where we are required to do so for legal reasons.

Ownership of AIs We retain all our respective rights, title, and interest, including intellectual property rights, in and to AIs. Other than the rights of access and use expressly granted in these Terms, these Terms do not grant you any right, title, or interest in or to the AIs.

Third Party Materials AIs may use or be used in connection with content, services, features, and integrations provided by third parties. Meta is not responsible for your use of third-party content, services, features, and integrations, and you use these at your own risk.

Accuracy of Outputs and Limitations on Liability Accuracy of Outputs

AIs are a new technology and are still improving. We make no guarantees that they will be safe, secure or error-free, or will function without disruptions, delays or imperfections. We are not responsible for Outputs, and you are responsible for checking Outputs for accuracy and suitability. The Outputs provided by AIs do not reflect the views of Meta, our affiliates or our personnel.

Limitations on Liability

Nothing in these Terms is intended to exclude or limit our liability for death, personal injury or fraudulent misrepresentation caused by our negligence, or to affect your statutory rights.

We will exercise professional diligence in providing the AIs to you in accordance with these Terms. Provided that we have acted with such professional diligence, we do not accept responsibility for losses not caused by our breach of these Terms or otherwise by our acts; losses that are not reasonably foreseeable by you and us at the time of entering into these Terms; and events beyond our reasonable control.

Disputes If a claim or dispute arises out of or relates to your use of the Meta AIs as a consumer, both you and us agree that you may resolve your individual claim or dispute against us, and we may resolve our claim or dispute against you, in any competent court in the country of your main residence that has jurisdiction over your claim or dispute, and the laws of that country will apply without regard to conflict of law provisions.

If a claim or dispute arises between us that relates to use of the Meta Products in any other capacity, including, but not limited to, access or use of the Meta AIs for a business or commercial purpose, or that an entity brings on your behalf, you agree that any such claim or dispute must be resolved exclusively in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California or a state court located in San Mateo County. You also agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of either of these courts for the purpose of litigating any such claim, and that the laws of the State of California will govern these Terms and any such claim or dispute without regard to conflict of law provisions. Without prejudice to the foregoing, you agree that, in its sole discretion, Meta may bring any claim, cause of action, or dispute we have against you in such a capacity in any competent court in Brazil that has jurisdiction over the claim.

Severability If any portion of these Terms is found to be unenforceable, the unenforceable portion will be deemed amended to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable, and if it can’t be made enforceable, then it will be severed and the remaining portion will remain in full force and effect. If we fail to enforce any of these Terms, it will not be considered a waiver. Any amendment to or waiver of these Terms must be made in writing and signed by us.

Changes to These Terms We work constantly to improve our services and develop new features to make our products better for you and our community. As a result, we may need to update these Terms from time to time to accurately reflect our services and practices, to promote a safe and secure experience, and/or to comply with applicable law. Unless the changes are required to comply with legal obligations, we will notify you (for example through email or in-app notification) of any changes to these Terms and give you an opportunity to review them before they go into effect. Once any updated Terms are in effect you will be bound by them if you continue to use our AIs. If you do not agree to the updated Terms, you should stop using AIs before they go into effect.

How to Contact Us You can contact Meta Platforms, Inc. by writing to:http://wordpress.com/[email protected]

Meta Platforms, Inc. ATTN: Operations 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA

Effective Date July 24, 2025 Last Updated: July 24, 2025]]

번호별 정리

1. 위키스 자료번호 1-10 (NR/NT) 2. 위키스 자료번호 11-20 3. 위키스 자료번호 21-30 4. 위키스 자료번호 31-40 (32만 업데이트) 5. 위키스 자료번호 41-50 (42만 업데이트) 6. 위키스 자료번호 51-60 (59 60만 업데이트)

현행

1. 위키스 자료번호 61-70

[61] Taiwan: Can a perfect storm be averted?

2016년 차이잉원 총통이 대만 당국의 지도자로 선출되면서 대만 해협을 둘러싼 일련의 부정적인 상호작용이 시작되었습니다. 도널드 트럼프의 당선과 미국의 '하나의 중국 정책'을 약화시키려는 그의 노력은 상황을 더욱 악화시켰습니다. 타이완은 베이징의 레드라인에 도전할 용기를 얻었지만, 베이징은 타이완에 더 많은 압력을 가할 필요가 있다고 생각했습니다. 더 큰 역량과 대중의 압력을 받고 있는 중국은 대만 독립이라는 도전에 대응하기 위해 보다 적극적인 접근 방식을 취했습니다. 타이베이, 베이징, 워싱턴 간의 악순환적인 상호 작용 과정은 마치 퍼펙트 스톰이 형성되는 과정과 유사합니다. 이 백서에서는 시간이 지남에 따라 이러한 3자 간 상호 작용이 어떻게 진화했는지 검토하고, 이러한 상황을 형성하는 주요 요인을 식별하며, 관련된 주요 요인을 분석하여 향후 상황을 추측합니다. 이 논문은 퍼펙트 스톰이 실제로 현실화되고 있지만 이를 피할 수 있다고 주장합니다. 하지만 그러기 위해서는 3자가 합리적이고 실용적인 접근 방식을 통해 서로의 요구와 욕구를 관리해야 합니다.

양안관계 문서에서 주요 내용등이 인용됨.

[62] Fairbank, John King. “On the Ch’ing Tributary System.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 6, no. 2 (1941): 135-246. [63] Perdue, Peter. “The Tenacious Tributary System.” Journal of Contemporary China 24, no. 96 (2015): 1002-1014. [64] Zhang, Feng. “Rethinking the ‘Tribute System’: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (2009): 545-574. [65] Zhang, Yongjin and Barry Buzan. “The Tributary System as International Society in Theory and Practice.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (2012): 3-36. [66] Ford, Christopher A. The Mind of Empire: China's History and Modern Foreign Relations 2010. Chapters 6, 7, 10, and 14-16. [67] Westad, Odd Arne. Restless Empire: China and the World Since 1750. New York: Basic Books, 2012. Chapter 4, 7, and 8 (pp. 285-292). [68]Mitter, Rana. A Bitter Revolution: China’s Struggle with the Modern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 102-152. [69] Lary, Diana. China’s Civil War: A Social History, 1945-1949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Chapter 4. (A scanned copy will be provided) [70] Duara, Prasenjit. Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003. Chapter 6. (A scanned copy will be provided)

71 - 80

[71] Wang, Dong. “The Discourse of Unequal Treaties in Modern China.” Pacific Affairs 76, no. 3 (2003): 399-425. [72] Waltz, Kenneth. Man, the state, and war: A theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press, 2018. [73] Paul, T. V. "Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory, J. Samuel Barkin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 194." Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 44.4 (2011): 980-981. [74] Ripsman, Norrin M., Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, and Steven E. Lobell. Neoclassical realist theory of international politics. Oxford University Press, 2016. [75] Morgenthau, Hans Joachim, Kenneth W. Thompson, and W. David Clinton. "Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace." (1985). [76] Stepan, Alfred. “Comparative Theory and Political Practice: Do We Need a ‘State-Nation’ Model as Well as a ‘Nation-State’ Model?” Government and Opposition, vol. 43, no. 1, 2008, pp. 1–25., doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00241.x. 링크 [77] Schlumberger, Oliver, et al. “How Authoritarianism Transforms: A Framework for the Study of Digital Dictatorship.” Government and Opposition, 2023, pp. 1–23., doi:10.1017/gov.2023.20. [78] Labanino, Rafael, and Michael Dobbins. “The Macro-Political Context and Interest Groups' Access to Policymakers.” Government and Opposition, 2023, pp. 1–26., doi:10.1017/gov.2023.17. [79] Carothers, Christopher. “The Autocrat's Corruption Dilemma.” Government and Opposition, vol. 58, no. 1, 2023, pp. 22–38., doi:10.1017/gov.2021.23. [80] Ayan Musil, Pelin, and Şebnem Yardımcı-Geyikçi. “Transnationalization of Opposition Strategy under Competitive Authoritarianism: Evidence from Turkey and Hungary.” Government and Opposition, 2023, pp. 1–19., doi:10.1017/gov.2023.19.

81 - 90

[81] Book

Bull, Hedley. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012.

[82] Book

[82] Skilling, Harold Gordon, and Franklyn Griffiths, eds. Interest groups in Soviet politics. Princeton University Press, 2019.

[83] Book

[83] Berry, Jeffrey M. Lobbying for the people: The political behavior of public interest groups. Princeton University Press, 2015. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x11mt?

[84] Book

[84] Cigler, Allan J., Burdett A. Loomis, and Anthony J. Nownes, eds. Interest group politics. Cq Press, 2015.

[85] A comparative study of interest groups and the political process

Almond, Gabriel A. "A comparative study of interest groups and the political process." American Political Science Review 52.1 (1958): 270-282.

[86] Interest groups in the USSR: The impact of political sensitivity on group influence

Kelley, Donald R. "Interest groups in the USSR: The impact of political sensitivity on group influence." The Journal of Politics 34.3 (1972): 860-888.

[87] The evolution of telecommunications policy-making: Comparative analysis of China and India

Liu, Chun, and Krishna Jayakar. "The evolution of telecommunications policy-making: Comparative analysis of China and India." Telecommunications Policy 36.1 (2012): 13-28.

[88] 독재의 권력투쟁에 대한 비교연구

https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002598426

본 논문은 느슨한 엘리트 연합의 집단지도체제가 개인독재로 퇴행하는 과정에서 광범위하게 관찰되는 독재의 책략을 설명할 수 있는 가설을 제시하고 일치법과 차이법의 비교방법론에 의거하여선정한 공산국가와 중동독재를 비교분석한다. 독재정치에 만연한 비밀주의와 정보의 불확실성은 위험한 집단행동에 필요한 엘리트 사이의 공동지식의 형성을 방해하고 조정이 아닌 죄수의 딜레마를조장한다. 비교연구는 인사 정책과 숙청 방식 등에서 정보의 불확실성을 유지하기 위해 독재자들이공통적으로 사용하는 구체적 술책을 밝히고 있다. 동시에 독재자는 낮은 수준에서 조절된 개인우상화를 권력투쟁 초기부터 시도하여 신참 엘리트의 조정을 도모하여 세를 확장한다. 점진적인 숙청으로 무기력해진 엘리트가 마지막으로 벌이는 최초이자 최후의 집단 저항이라는 가설 역시 정보의문제와 연결되어 있다. 이러한 가설들을 김일성, 마오쩌둥, 사담 후세인, 하페즈 알아사드, 스탈린의 사례에 대입하여 가설들의 경험적 타당성을 살펴본다.

[89] Book

Lowenhardt, John. Decision Making in Soviet Politics. Springer, 1981.

[90] Book

Schelling, Thomas C. "Arms and inﬂuence." Strategic Studies. Routledge, 2008. 96-114.

91 - 100